More Pie in the Sky?

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
FD2
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 5305
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 10:11 pm
Location: New Zealand
Gender:
Age: 77

More Pie in the Sky?

#1 Post by FD2 »

Supersonic flights on the horizon as United orders 'new Concorde'


Supersonic flights on the horizon as United orders 'new Concorde'.png
Supersonic flights on the horizon as United orders 'new Concorde'.png (403.53 KiB) Viewed 3027 times


Supersonic flights from London to New York are set to take off for the first time since Concorde retired in 2003 following a pioneering deal between United Airlines and aerospace start-up Boom Supersonic.

United has said it will buy as many as 50 of Boom's Overture jets, which fly at 1.7 times the speed of sound and could cross the Atlantic in just three and a half hours.

The jets - which are still in development - will carry between 65 and 88 passengers, fewer than the 100 seats available on Concorde flights. They will be able to fly at 1,100mph at an altitude of 60,000ft.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... -concorde/

It's going to be flown on refined chip shop oil and other household waste. Yeh, right.
PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 9282
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 69

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#2 Post by PHXPhlyer »

The dream of supersonic passenger flight hits turbulence

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/aeri ... index.html

(CNN) — The long-held dream of a successor to Concorde just got a little farther away as one of the major contenders in the race to build a supersonic passenger jet appears to have run out of financial fuel.
Aerion, based in Reno, Nevada, had been developing the AS2 (pictured top), an 8-12 passenger business jet capable of flying at 1,000 mph. However, the company announced on May 21 that "in the current financial environment, it has proven hugely challenging to close on the scheduled and necessary large new capital requirements to finalize the transition of the AS2 into production."
It added that, "Given these conditions the Aerion Corporation is now taking the appropriate steps in consideration of this ongoing financial environment."

It's a colossal disappointment to business travelers who had hoped to fly supersonically in the near future. What makes it all so shocking is that the AS2 was already at an advanced phase of development, having recently concluded high-speed wind tunnel testing, clocking up hundreds of flight hours -- the equivalent of 78,000 nautical miles flown -- at the ONERA French aerospace testing lab in Modane, France.
The AS2's development was conceived of as a totally carbon-neutral endeavor, whereby Aerion used digital modeling techniques to save fuel and "negate the need for costly demonstrator aircraft and accelerate the program to the final stages of validation ahead of production." Actual manufacture had been slated for 2023, with a plan to build 300 airplanes within a decade.
The AS2, said Aerion in an official statement, "meets all market, technical, regulatory and sustainability requirements, and the market for a new supersonic segment of general aviation has been validated with $11.2 billion in sales backlog." The company also had the backing of Boeing -- although the United States' biggest planemaker currently has its own challenges to deal with, not least its 737 MAX woes.
As recently as this January CNN Travel reported on the roll out of Aerion's new clean energy HQ, Aerion Park in Florida, designed to combine the company's operations with a campus for research, design, build and maintenance of the company's aircraft.


A setback for the jet set
All of this is certainly disheartening for the clientele of luxury jet operator Flexjet, the lead customer for the AS2, which had surely hoped to experience the thrill of breaking the sound barrier while shaving valuable minutes off business trips. Nevertheless, Flexjet's chairman, Kenn Ricci, seems to be taking the news philosophically:
"Flexjet ordered its AS2's from Aerion Supersonic in 2015 and the company has been a supporter of the program since then," he says. "While we are disappointed to hear from the company that they are ceasing operations, we understand the vast investment required by such programs to bring them to fruition and the inherent risks involved."

But a question hovering over the aspiration to travel supersonically is: How much of a time-saving can be made when we factor in all the elements of the complete door-to-door journey, now that this includes extra time-consuming health procedures at airports?
IATA's latest findings confirm that, at peak times, airport processing times have now ballooned to twice that of pre-Covid journeys, with traffic volumes still only at about 30 of pre-Covid 19 levels.
The greatest increases, says IATA, are at check-in and border control (emigration and immigration) where travel health credentials are being checked mainly as paper documents. Modeling suggests that, "without process improvements, time spent in airport processes could reach 5.5 hours per trip at 75% pre-Covid-19 traffic levels, and 8.0 hours per trip at 100% pre-Covid-19 traffic levels."

The end-to-end journey
IATA's findings now mean that the airborne segment of travel is just the central component within what is becoming a longer ordeal.
"Passengers, both business and leisure, have become more aware of the notion of journey time rather than just flight time," Iain Gray, head of aeronautical engineering at Cranfield University, tells CNN Travel.
Early in his career, Gray led the European international team on what was called the European Supersonic Research Program, which worked on the design of the successor for Concorde.
"We were working with the Russians, the Japanese, the Americans, and the Europeans on Concorde's potential replacement, an international effort at the time, and we put quite a lot of effort into the 'fare elasticity model,' looking at the premium people would pay for the benefit of flying supersonic."
Gray's team found only a small number of people who would "pay an awful lot of money for the privilege of reduced flight times." And, today, the high cost of flying supersonically is not the only obstacle as ever more stringent environment objectives come into play.
"The challenges around the environment are escalating with every year that goes by, so every time supersonic technology catches up with what the environmental targets of today are, the goalposts have moved," says Gray. He points out that even flying over water, new supersonic plane-makers will have to consider such things as the impact of sonic booms on marine life, in addition to taking account of CO2 and the noise disturbance to the human populations when flying over land

But Gray also points out that aviation economics can change dramatically too.
"People would not have imagined 25 years ago that low-cost subsonic carriers would be able to offer fares that are cheaper than the cost to park your car at the airport," he says. "So it's foolish to say that [affordable] supersonic flight would never ever happen, but for the moment there are escalating challenges. The technical solutions are there, but they're expensive."

Meanwhile, economics is also of course a challenge for today's aviation, let alone tomorrow's, with global passenger numbers not expected to recover to pre-Covid levels until 2023.
And conventional flight is going to get pricier, at least while social distancing, less frequent flight schedules, and extra airport procedures remain the norm. Assuming that health verification could likely become a long-term (if not permanent) feature of air travel -- just as extra security measures have become, post 9/11 -- the time-saving benefits of supersonic flight need further scrutiny.
"Travel is rebounding. However, the highly profitable business travel segment is lagging the leisure crowd," John Schmidt, Accenture's global aerospace and defense industry lead, tells CNN Travel.
"Future business travel levels are still an unknown, but needs may be different, and demand will emerge over a period of years. Business travelers have always valued speed and the ability to land at the destination and be immediately productive, whether with business jets or more comfortable commercial aircraft experiences. Supersonic aircraft build on that desire and value."
Schmidt adds that even with stronger views on sustainability looming, "aircraft developers seem to be rising to that challenge as well since they are able to work from clean sheet designs. This is a long-term play with aircraft anticipated to be certificated in late 2020s and 2030s, so it is certainly a big bet as aircraft developers are betting on the business traveler's desire for speed and the ability to hit the ground running to remain intact."
"That," he concludes, "has fueled business jet and commercial aviation offerings innovation for the past few decades and there does not seem to be a reason for our current travel pause to change that in the long term."

While the remaining supersonic contenders duke it out to bring faster jets to market, private jet operators are doing their best to address the business traveler's appetite for speed with aircraft that are as close to the sound barrier as they can be without actually breaking it, which poses all kinds of environmental issues.
"There is no doubt that supersonic and hypersonic aircraft will change the landscape of aviation once they are available to the public," Ian Moore, chief commercial officer at VistaJet, tells CNN Travel.

Malta-based VistaJet, which offers access to private jets on a "tailored flight hour subscription plan," has been ramping up its fleet of Bombardier Global 7500 aircraft which are capable of a top speed of 852 kilometers per hour, or Mach 0.925 -- virtually the fastest subsonic speed an airplane can fly at.
"We will continue to invest in our infrastructure and global fleet. At the beginning of April VistaJet took delivery of the Global 7500, as the first to offer this ground-breaking aircraft to the commercial marketplace, with more to come later this year," says Moore.
He adds, "The Bombardier Global 7500 has changed the game with its record-breaking speed, industry-leading range, and jet lag-reducing features. Until now, there has not been any major speed-up in travel times since the Jet Age of the '50s and '60s."

PP
G-CPTN
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 7786
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 11:22 pm
Location: Tynedale
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#3 Post by G-CPTN »

The success of this venture depends on combating the sonic boom.
Why have the World's military not have already solved this?

Do we have to rely on Aliens to impart the secret?

Overture engines.
User avatar
TheGreenGoblin
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 17584
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 11:02 pm
Location: With the Water People near Trappist-1

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#4 Post by TheGreenGoblin »

G-CPTN wrote:
Thu Jun 03, 2021 8:36 pm
The success of this venture depends on combating the sonic boom.
Why have the World's military not have already solved this?
I have always thought that the name Boom for a supersonic passenger jet manufacturing company was pushing their luck a bit!

https://boomsupersonic.com/flyby/post/w ... -build-one

Personally I hope they weather the current economic storm and succeed. The technology is potentially viable and we need to move forward in this area.



https://boomsupersonic.com/flyby/post/q ... raft-types
Though you remain
Convinced
"To be alive
You must have somewhere
To go
Your destination remains
Elusive."
PHXPhlyer
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 9282
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:56 pm
Location: PHX
Gender:
Age: 69

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#5 Post by PHXPhlyer »

How the next supersonic jets can succeed where Concorde failed

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/how- ... index.html

(CNN) — United Airlines has announced it will purchase up to 50 Boom Overture supersonic jets for commercial use by 2029, heralding the return of supersonic passenger flights nearly 20 years after the Concorde was decommissioned.
Supersonic planes halve the time it takes to fly from New York to London, from seven hours down to 3.5 hours, but such airliners were abandoned following Concorde's final flight in 2003. Concorde had become financially unworkable after a high-profile crash in 2000, combined with excessive ticket prices, high fuel consumption, and increasingly high maintenance costs.
If Boom's supersonic aircraft (pictured above) is to succeed, it will depend on overcoming these issues that derailed Concorde. So can it be done?
Breaking the sound barrier
Supersonic flights are so called because they travel faster than the speed of sound. To do this, the aircraft must break through the sound barrier, which requires an efficient aerodynamic design to reduce drag, and considerable thrust from powerful engines to overcome the turbulence caused by shock waves.

United Airlines will purchase 15 supersonic jets from Denver-based company Boom Supersonic. With the proper safety, operating, and sustainability requirements, United plans to have the jets fully operational by 2029.
Breaking the sound barrier also requires engines which burn through lots of jet fuel -- one of Concorde's key drawbacks and something that's only become more contentious in recent years. You'd therefore expect Boom, which is in the prototype stage of developing the Overture, to concentrate its designs on increasing fuel efficiency.
The Colorado-based company is likely to choose between a turbojet and turbofan engine. A turbojet produces all of its thrust from its exhaust gas when it is moving at faster speeds. A turbofan engine, meanwhile, derives most of its thrust from the amount of the air it accelerates with its fan blades. The amount of this air defines the engine's "bypass ratio".
Higher bypass ratio turbofan engines are more fuel efficient than turbojets. Their lower exhaust speed makes them quieter, but they tend to be larger, resulting in higher drag at supersonic speeds. This drag penalty has outweighed the efficiency of turbofans for prolonged supersonic flight in the past.
A good compromise might be a low bypass turbofan with an afterburner, which injects additional fuel to significantly increase the available thrust, and is commonly used on military jets. Such an engine was used in early production versions of another supersonic passenger jet, the Russian Tupelov Tu-144, but was too inefficient because it needed to keep firing its afterburners to maintain supersonic cruise.

The Tupolev Tu-144 was the Soviet rival to the Anglo-French Concorde, but its rushed development made it notoriously unreliable and unpleasant to fly.
AFP/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
The Tu-144's afterburner also contributed to a very noisy cabin, humming loudly at 90 decibels -- roughly the sound generated by a hairdryer -- which exceeds regulatory safety limits. The Concorde's turbojets, meanwhile, only needed afterburners at take-off and to break through the sound barrier, improving its fuel economy and lowering cabin noise while supercruising.
Supersonic jet noise
Due to the noise they generate, supersonic jets aren't allowed to fly over land. But these restrictions could be lifted with refined aerodynamic design. For example, research by NASA on its X-59 QueSST programme hopes to produce optimised airframe shapes which could significantly reduce overland sonic booms to a much quieter "thud" -- coming in at 75 decibels rather than the Concorde's 105 decibel boom.
Getting the aerodynamics right could also open up the possibility of using modern, lightweight composite materials to enable better thrust-to-weight ratios -- perhaps eliminating the need for afterburners at take-off.
Substantial developments in computational fluid dynamics software and other simulation programs since the 1970s will be crucial in evaluating these designs and getting them certified to Boom's tight production deadlines.
Sustainable aviation fuel
Boom is also promoting its aircraft's green credentials. Part of the United deal involves collaborative development in establishing a reliable supply of sustainable aviation fuel. This will ultimately benefit other aircraft in United's fleet and the industry at large, which currently produces around 2.8% of all global CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel combustion.
Sustainable aviation fuels include biofuels and synthetic kerosine that are manufactured using renewable and sustainable materials. An impressive 80% reduction in lifecycle CO₂ emissions is often quoted. The key word here though is "lifecycle"; it doesn't necessarily mean less harmful emissions from the engine.
These sustainable fuels are compatible with conventional jet fuel, which means no changes to airport fuelling infrastructure or engine design will be needed for them to be introduced -- a critical factor in their uptake. But these fuels are very expensive, because the raw materials needed to make them aren't available at scale. The total amount of sustainable aviation fuel currently being used amounts to just 0.1% of the total fuel spent in the air. Projections estimate this needs to reach somewhere between 1.4% and 3.7% before such fuels become economically viable.

A return to supersonic flights?
Boom will be optimistic that it can overcome fuel efficiency challenges by the time its aircraft begins carrying fare-paying passengers in 2029. Those fares look set to be high, with Boom anticipating a £3,500 ($4,930) price tag per seat. In 1996, British Airways charged around £5,350 -- £8,800 in today's prices -- for round-trip tickets from New York to London.
This means that, like Concorde before it, the Boom Overture looks aimed at the luxury market -- beyond the reach of even business class passengers. It is likely to be frequented only by those who currently travel via private jet, who may be enticed by Boom's claims to be a sustainable aircraft manufacturer.
So, while supersonic passenger jets may return to our skies by the end of the decade, the closest most of us will get to experiencing them will be when they unleash their characteristic sonic booms above our heads.

PP
G-CPTN
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 7786
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 11:22 pm
Location: Tynedale
Gender:
Age: 80

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#6 Post by G-CPTN »

I remain sceptical.
Pontius Navigator
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 14681
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
Location: Gravity be the clue
Gender:
Age: 81

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#7 Post by Pontius Navigator »

2029? 9 years or 7, depends on the month. What other revolutionary civil airliner has made it that quickly?
User avatar
llondel
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 6411
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2018 3:17 am
Location: San Jose

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#8 Post by llondel »

Pontius Navigator wrote:
Fri Jun 11, 2021 7:23 am
2029? 9 years or 7, depends on the month. What other revolutionary civil airliner has made it that quickly?
Isn't that the point? It's supposed to be much faster than other current civil airliners? :)
Pontius Navigator
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Posts: 14681
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:17 am
Location: Gravity be the clue
Gender:
Age: 81

Re: More Pie in the Sky?

#9 Post by Pontius Navigator »

Oh, I didn't realise the FAA was being reorganised.

😅
Post Reply